October 9, 2009

War is (Still) a Racket

Over seventy years ago, Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler wrote:

War is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

Sadly, little has changed since Butler penned those words. America continues sending its soldiers into harm’s way, while the likes of Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) and General Dynamics (GD) continue raking in the dough. Of course, none of this war profiteering would be possible without politicians, whose job it is to trick the public into believing that war, or at least the current war, really is necessary, that if we don’t keep bombing all those defenseless Cambodians or Iraqis or Afghans, then somehow the world won’t be safe for democracy, somehow the things Americans most value will be jeopardized.

Our politicians don’t actually believe that wars will make the world a better place. They start wars, they send other people’s sons and daughters into harm’s way, because they themselves stand to profit. According to an April 2008 study by the Center for Responsive Politics, members of Congress have between $79 million and $196 million of their own money invested in defense firms. (Because lawmakers are “only required to report their assets in broad ranges,” the exact amount is unknown.) The Congressmen with the most money invested are:

  • Sen. John Kerry (D-MA): $28,872,067 to $38,209,020
  • Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ): $12,081,050 to $49,140,000
  • Rep. Robin Hayes (R-NC): $9,232,037 to $37,105,000
  • Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-WI): $5,207,668 to $7,612,653
  • Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA): $2,684,050 to $6,260,000
  • Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI): $2,469,029 to $8,360,000
  • Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV): $2,000,002
  • Rep. Tom Petri (R-WI): $1,365,004 to $5,800,000
Not surprisingly, all of the above individuals are warmongers. All of them, for instance, voted for the Iraq War in 2002. (See Senate vote here, House vote here.)

Also not surprisingly, the above individuals receive money—lots and lots of money—from defense firms in the form of campaign contributions. For instance, Frelinghuysen’s top donor is Lockheed Martin, and four of Jane Harman’s top five donors are Northrop Grumman (NOC), Raytheon (RTN), Boeing (BA), and SAIC (SAI). The same is true of other congressional warmongers. If you don’t believe me, just go to OpenSecrets.org and look at all the money that such firms as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Dynamics have doled out over the years.

Now unless you’re a real idiot, it’s not tough to connect the dots here. Simply put, more war means more money for defense firms, which in turn means more money for members of Congress.

The answer to all this is, first of all, to get pissed, to get really pissed. I mean, let it all out. The system’s a fraud! You’re being used! Your sons and daughters are being sent out to die so a bunch of sleazy politicians can make a buck!

After you’ve gotten this out of your system, you need to do something about it. Follow Jim Davidson’s lead and divest from the death merchants. If you own stocks in any of these companies, sell them. If you have US Savings Bonds, cash them in. And, of course, do all you can to kick these sleazebags out of office.

And then tell others what’s going on. Blog about it, yell it out your window, whatever.

Look, I’m not exactly an optimist. I’m not saying we’re going to end the wars. But we at least have to try.


David_Z said...

Great post! It's hard to explain to people, how and why politicians and their well-connected friends wage wars, paid for by everyone else.

But you seriously should consider getting rid of the blinking hyperlinks, that's a bizarre and distracting text decoration that doesn't add any value.

Don Emmerich Jr. said...

Thanks so much for your comment, David!

I don't see any blinking hyperlinks on my end. How weird. I wonder if the site just had a temporary glitch.

Don Emmerich Jr. said...

I logged onto my site via FireFox and finally saw the blinking hyperlinks. I had no idea it was doing that. For some reason, the hyperlinks don't blink on Internet Explorer. So thanks for the head's up -- I've fixed it.

ammueller said...

I was brought here from another friends post. Great point of view, I too will be reposting this. Thanks.

Check out http://motorhomediaries.com

We have similar blog rolls.

Don Emmerich Jr. said...

Thanks for your comments, ammueller. And thanks for the link. I'm excited to check it out.

Greg said...

I was going to have a serious chat with you about those annoying blinking hyperlinks ... glad someone else did! :-)

The site is looking great!

Don Emmerich Jr. said...

Thanks, Greg. And please feel free to talk to me about my hyperlinks anytime. :-)